Language: English
ISBN/ISSN: 9787508529592
Published on: 2014-11
Soft Cover
The Diaoyu Islands 《钓鱼岛》主要内容包括认识钓鱼岛、钓鱼岛的价值、钓鱼岛为什么属于中国、日本如何窃取钓鱼岛、二战后钓鱼岛理应归还中国、美国“托管”埋下祸根、“搁置争议”的默契共识、谁在“改变现状”以及中国维护钓鱼岛主权的努力九个方面。通过对这些问题的阐述，力图全方位地介绍钓鱼岛问题，以期说明钓鱼岛属于中国的历史事实和法理依据，批判日本的无理主张和非法挑衅，向社会大众揭示事实真相，以正视听。
Knowing Diaoyu Dao
The Values of Diaoyu Dao
Territorial Sovereignty and Maritime Rights and lnterests
Natural Resources
Security and Strategic Values
Political Values
Why Does Diaoyu Dao Belong to China？
Diaoyu Dao was First Discovered， Named and Exploited by China
Diaoyu Dao Had Long Been under China's Jurisdiction
Chinese and Foreign Maps Show that Diaoyu Dao Belongs to China
How Did Japan Grab Diaoyu Dao from China？
Japan's Long—term Covert Moves to Seize Diaoyu Dao
Japan's Secret Incorporation of Diaoyu Dao into Its Territory
Diaoyu Dao was Ceded to Japan together with the Taiwan Island
Transfer of Real Property Right after Japan's Occupation of Diaoyu Dao
Japan Should Return Diaoyu Dao to China After WWⅡ
Stipulations in Cairo Declaration： All the Territories Japan has Stolen from the Chinese Shall be Restored to China
Potsdam Proclamation： Limiting Japanese Sovereignty
Japan's Surrender Documents Admitting its International Obligations
Root of the Trouble： U.S.'s "Administration"
Diaoyu Dao Never Belongs to the Ryukyu Islands
The United States Illegally Included Diaoyu Dao under Its "Trusteeship" of the Ryukyu Archipelago
The United States and Japan Conducted Backroom Deals Conceming the "Power of Administration" over Diaoyu Dao
Changes of the U.S.Positions
Acquiescence in Shelving Differences
China and Japan Regarded the Overall Situation of Reestablishing Diplomatic Relations and Agreed to "Shelve This Issue for the Time Being and Wait for Other Opportunities to Discuss It"
The Acquiescence in Shelving Differences Formed during the Diplomatic Normalization of the Sino—Japanese Relations
China's Proposal of Shelving Differences and Seeking Joint Development
Japan's Control of Right—wingers Demonstratcs that It Acknowledges That There is A Territorial Dispute over the Diaoyu Dao
Who Is Changing the Status Quo？
The So—called "Power of Administration"
Officially Supported Civil Activities
Strictly "Coordinated Control" of Military Police
Thorough Military Deployment of lsland Retaking
China's Efforts to Uphold Its Sovereignty over Diaoyu Dao
Forceful Countermeasures of Chinesc Government
Unremitting Endeavors of China's Civil Activists
China's Steadfast Resolve to Defend Its Sovereignty
Epilogue：Facing History Squarely and Building the Future
Postscript
Bibliography
